MuseGreen login Subscribe
MuseGreen MuseGreen MuseGreen MuseGreen MuseGreen MuseGreen MuseGreen MuseGreen MuseGreen MuseGreen MuseGreen
So far, the MuseGreen community has provided funding for the planting of 117 trees and we've a combined Ocean Quotient of 60. Want to help? Simply shop or play for trees or the Oceans and we'll do the rest! Sign-up and make it count!


it’s a bum wrap

December 18th, 2008 by lorraine · 3 comments

babysbum

A recent report out in the UK suggests that traditional nappies (diapers) are no better for the environment than disposable ones.

Ben Bradshaw, the new health minister, made the comment after a four-year study by the Environment Agency concluded that “there is little or nothing to choose between them”. It found that the damage caused by burying disposables in landfill sites was matched by the electricity and greenhouse gases generated by washing and drying cloth nappies.

In response to a parliamentary question, Mr Bradshaw, a former environment minister, told the Commons: “Reusable nappies may reduce demands on landfill but they still impact on the environment in other ways such as water and energy used in washing and drying them.”

Only five per cent of parents are now thought to use cloth nappies, and nearly three billion nappies are thrown away annually, with 90 per cent ending up in landfill. (read full story here)

Whatever your position on that argument, I thought I’d highlight some of the emerging planet-friendlier diaper options available right now, as featured in a recent Kiwi magazine report. They rival their non-green counterparts in performance and also don’t contain the health hazards such as dioxin (which is a highly toxic byproduct of the pulp and paper’s chlorine bleaching process), tributyltin (or TBT, a hormone-disrupting chemical),  fragrances and latex (which can cause allergies in some babies). Did you even know all that crap was buried inside the regular disposable and leaching into your baby’s skin? BPA, TBT… it’s nothing short of criminal.

The following eco-diapers all passed the test on a healthy, active 7 month old. Here’s what the study had to say about each one:

gdiaper

gDiapers

A hybrid diaper with reusable outer cover and disposable inner lining ($17 per diaper, $15 per 32-count package of inner refills) www.gdiapers.com

Pros

  • flush, toss or compost soiled linings
    • when tossed, lining biodegrades faster than other disposables
    • when flushed, waste goes through treatment facilities
    • bridges gap between disposables and cloth

Cons

  • potential leakage around legs
  • can be tough on weak plumbing systems (plus we really don’t want to use water to dispose of our trash – see last post!)
  • petroleum-derived liner inside the cover
  • debatable safety of sodium polyacrylate gel (studies have shown that sodium polyacrylate, an absorbent gel found in most disposables, is safe and non-toxic, yet the chemical makes some purists uneasy)


fuzzi bunz

Fuzzi Bunz

Reusable pocket system with a microfleece inner layer and a waterproff out layer ($20 per diaper) www.fuzzibunz.com

Pros

  • absorbency customisation
  • variable snap closure for fit
  • soft on baby’s skin

Cons

  • man-made fibers


seventh generation

Seventh Generation

Natural, unbleached, disposable diaper ($11 per 35 count pack) www.babiesrus.com

Pros

  • soft and cloth-like
  • conforming
  • stretchy leg gussets
  • hypoallergenic
  • widely available

Cons

  • debatable safety of sodium polyacrylate gel


tendercare plus

Tendercare Plus

White, chlorine-free, disposable diaper ($11 per 24 count pack) www.drugstore.com

Pros

  • wood pulp from sustainable forests
  • soft
  • GMO-free
  • hypoallergenic top sheet
  • conforming

Cons

  • debatable safety of sodium polyacrylate gel


bummis bamboozle

Bummis Bamboozle

Reusable, fitted bamboo diaper ($20 per diaper) www.bummis.com

Pros

  • eco-friendly
  • naturally antibacterial bamboo
  • snaps offer adjustable fit
  • sewn-in strip allows tailored absorbency
  • can also be used with Bummis flushable and biodegradable liners for easier clean-up

Cons

  • requires separate waterproof cover
  • no leakage with this one, but wetness spreads throughout diaper


bumgenius

bumGenius 3.0

Reusable, one-size-fits-all pocket system with Velcro closure ($18 per diaper) www.cottonbabies.com

Pros

  • no need to size up as baby grows
  • absorbency customisation
  • soft inner layer
  • waterproof outer layer
  • Velcro sppeds up changing time

Cons

  • man-made fibers


nature babycare

Nature Babycare

Disposable diaper made of at least 60% biodegradable materials ($12 per 34 count pack) www.diapers.com

Pros

  • outer layer derived from GMO-free corn
  • no oil-based plastic touches baby’s skin
  • wood pulp from sustainable forests
  • compostable packaging

Cons

  • debatable safety of sodium polyacrylate granules
  • somewhat stiff

So, there you have it. I’m in the midst of potty training my 4th child right now but, even though my need for diapers is finally waning, I’m definitely going to check these out!


email updates



3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 eve // Jan 19, 2009 at 9:21 pm

    Thanks for the info. I recently did a post titled: Cloth Diaper Mama Drama. That pretty much sums up my so far 3 year experience w/ two kids. I might actually try those Nature Babycare diapers for a backup to my fuzzibunz. I like little G pants a lot too, but it’s my opinion that the starter pack should come with a plumbing auger!

  • 2 lorraine // Jan 23, 2009 at 10:52 am

    Hi Eve

    I love your site – fabulous! I’m glad to see that there are more of us about!
    Fancy a link share?

  • 3 Eric // Feb 8, 2009 at 1:50 am

    I heard a news story about a company that is now composting disposable diapers. I wonder how this compares to laundering cloth?
    The website is http://www.earth-baby.com

Leave a Comment

MuseGreen MuseGreen MuseGreen MuseGreen MuseGreen MuseGreen MuseGreen